Glossary/M/Marsh Cyber Echo™
    Insurance Term

    Marsh Cyber Echo™

    Marsh Cyber Echo™ is a Marsh-branded excess cyber insurance facility that provides cyber and technology risk capacity, designed to help clients access additional limits and reinstatement features above underlying cyber programmes.

    The term is relevant to directors, officers, risk managers, company secretaries, investors, and insurers because management liability claims can threaten both corporate balance sheets and personal assets. For example, if shareholders, regulators, creditors, or employees allege that leaders mismanaged the company, the D&O programme may fund defence costs, settlements, or indemnification depending on the side of cover and exclusions. A practical way to read it is to ask: who is protected, whether the company can indemnify them, which layer pays, and whether defence costs erode the policy limit. The response usually involves legal, IT, communications, HR, and insurance teams working together under tight timelines. . In practice, two policies can use similar wording but produce different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law change the final interpretation. When in doubt, the safest approach is to compare the term with the exact contract wording and ask the broker, adviser, insurer, or administrator to confirm how it applies to the specific situation.

    How to read it in your program

    What does this term mean for us? Read “Marsh Cyber Echo™” in the exact context of your policy schedule, not just the headline definition.
    Where does it bite? Limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law shape the final outcome — even when the wording looks familiar.
    Who can confirm it? Your broker can confirm how the term applies to your specific program, employees, and renewal cycle.
    A note on context. The same word can carry a narrow technical meaning in policy wording and a broader commercial meaning in conversation. Two policies can use similar wording but reach different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law shape the final interpretation. When in doubt, compare the term against your exact contract wording and ask your broker how it applies to your situation.

    Where “Marsh Cyber Echo™” shows up at VIMA

    Pages that explain how this works inside a live employee benefits programme.

    Related terms

    Terms that often appear alongside “Marsh Cyber Echo™” in a policy schedule.

    Managed FundManaged fund is a pooled investment fund run by a professional manager according to a stated strategy, risk profile, and objective. The term is important when employers, trustees, insurers, or members choose funds, monitor performance, explain risk, or decide how savings should be invested over time. For example, a company pension committee may compare a growth fund, a bond fund, and a cash fund by looking at risk, expected return, time horizon, fees, and how each option fits the target investment mix. A practical way to read it is to ask: does this affect risk, return, liquidity, diversification, fees, or the time period over which the investment should be judged? It should be considered alongside the investor’s objective, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, governance process, and the time available before the money is needed. . In practice, two policies can use similar wording but produce different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law change the final interpretation. When in doubt, the safest approach is to compare the term with the exact contract wording and ask the broker, adviser, insurer, or administrator to confirm how it applies to the specific situation.Market Value AdjustmentMarket value adjustment is an adjustment applied when money is withdrawn, transferred, or surrendered from certain investment or with-profits products to reflect underlying market conditions. The term is important when employers, trustees, insurers, or members choose funds, monitor performance, explain risk, or decide how savings should be invested over time. For example, a company pension committee may compare a growth fund, a bond fund, and a cash fund by looking at risk, expected return, time horizon, fees, and how each option fits the target investment mix. A practical way to read it is to ask: does this affect risk, return, liquidity, diversification, fees, or the time period over which the investment should be judged? The key is to read the term in context, because the same phrase can have a narrow technical meaning in a policy wording and a broader commercial meaning in everyday discussions. . In practice, two policies can use similar wording but produce different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law change the final interpretation. When in doubt, the safest approach is to compare the term with the exact contract wording and ask the broker, adviser, insurer, or administrator to confirm how it applies to the specific situation.Marsh Global InsightMarsh Global Insight is a Marsh online platform that helps multinational clients access insurance, regulatory, tax, and country intelligence for global programme planning and compliance questions. The term is common in complex corporate insurance programmes where a parent company, local subsidiaries, brokers, insurers, reinsurers, and regulators must coordinate coverage across borders. For example, a business with subsidiaries in India, Germany, and the UK may use a master policy, local admitted policies, and reinsurance support so that local compliance and global coverage intent are both addressed. A practical way to read it is to ask: which entity is insured locally, which policy pays first, which insurer carries the risk, and whether the arrangement is compliant in the country concerned? The key is to read the term in context, because the same phrase can have a narrow technical meaning in a policy wording and a broader commercial meaning in everyday discussions. . In practice, two policies can use similar wording but produce different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law change the final interpretation. When in doubt, the safest approach is to compare the term with the exact contract wording and ask the broker, adviser, insurer, or administrator to confirm how it applies to the specific situation.Maternity Add-OnMaternity add-on is an optional health insurance benefit that adds maternity-related cover, often subject to waiting periods, sub-limits, and eligibility rules. The term is especially useful for HR teams, benefits managers, employees, insurers, and third-party administrators because it affects eligibility, hospital access, claim documentation, and the employee experience at the point of care. For example, an employee admitted for surgery may need to know whether the hospital is in-network, whether cashless treatment is available, what room limit applies, and which pre- and post-hospitalisation expenses can be claimed. A practical way to read it is to ask: does this affect eligibility, claim approval, out-of-pocket cost, provider access, or the documents an employee must submit? The key is to read the term in context, because the same phrase can have a narrow technical meaning in a policy wording and a broader commercial meaning in everyday discussions. . In practice, two policies can use similar wording but produce different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law change the final interpretation. When in doubt, the safest approach is to compare the term with the exact contract wording and ask the broker, adviser, insurer, or administrator to confirm how it applies to the specific situation.Medical Expenses InsuranceMedical Expenses Insurance is insurance that reimburses or pays eligible medical costs such as hospitalisation, surgery, consultations, medicines, diagnostics, and emergency treatment. The term is especially useful for HR teams, benefits managers, employees, insurers, and third-party administrators because it affects eligibility, hospital access, claim documentation, and the employee experience at the point of care. For example, an employee admitted for surgery may need to know whether the hospital is in-network, whether cashless treatment is available, what room limit applies, and which pre- and post-hospitalisation expenses can be claimed. A practical way to read it is to ask: does this affect eligibility, claim approval, out-of-pocket cost, provider access, or the documents an employee must submit? Plan wording should be checked for sub-limits, waiting periods, network restrictions, exclusions, and whether approval is needed before treatment. . In practice, two policies can use similar wording but produce different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law change the final interpretation. When in doubt, the safest approach is to compare the term with the exact contract wording and ask the broker, adviser, insurer, or administrator to confirm how it applies to the specific situation.Morrison V. National Australia BankMorrison v. National Australia Bank is a US Supreme Court case that limited the extraterritorial application of US securities laws, relevant to securities litigation and D&O exposure for non-US issuers. The term matters because insurance contracts, employee benefits, data handling, cross-border placements, and financial products are shaped by law, regulation, disclosure duties, governance standards, and enforcement risk. For example, a multinational buying insurance may need to check licensing, premium tax, sanctions, privacy rules, policy wording, disclosure duties, and which court or law applies if a dispute arises. A practical way to read it is to ask: what duty does the law impose, what evidence must be retained, and what happens if the rule is missed or breached? The key is to read the term in context, because the same phrase can have a narrow technical meaning in a policy wording and a broader commercial meaning in everyday discussions. . In practice, two policies can use similar wording but produce different outcomes because limits, exclusions, definitions, endorsements, and local law change the final interpretation. When in doubt, the safest approach is to compare the term with the exact contract wording and ask the broker, adviser, insurer, or administrator to confirm how it applies to the specific situation.